Has Google Done Enough to Keep Android Phones Up-to-date?

So when Google's Hugo
Barra announced a "platform developer kit" during the opening keynote
at I/O this week, the news was greeted with applause. The PDK will provide
Android phone makers with a preview version of upcoming Android releases,
making it easier for them to get the latest software in their new phones. Currently,
Google completes work on an OS update and then shares it with chip and phone
makers, who make sure it works with their hardware and tune it for their needs.
Carriers then sell the devices to consumers.
The PDK will provide
chip and phone makers with a release of the Android update earlier in the
process, before it's finalized. That will allow them to start their development
work sooner and get the software into consumers' hands more quickly when it's
finished, according to Google. But is the PDK enough to secure for developers
the single user experience for big numbers of Android users that developers
crave?
In a "fireside chat" with the Android team, the packed house of
developers had more questions about OS fragmentation than Google had answers. Asked
how the company intended to get Jelly Bean to users faster than it has Ice
Cream Sandwich, a staffer said, "We're going to first give you free
devices; that's one good way to start." Google is giving free tablets and
phones to developers at the event.
One developer asked about the Android Alliance announced at I/O in 2011 that would ensure that smartphones
got regular updates for at least 18 months. The Alliance was a commitment from
OEMs to ensure that users of their phones got relevant updates quickly, Google
said. The response was somewhat flippant. "What we said last year is that
we would make sure devices got supported for 18 months, but it hasn't been 18
months since last year so we can't prove or disprove if it's working or
not," said Dave Burke, Android engineering director.
It is perhaps this
sort of comment that leads analyst Brian Blau, with Gartner, to conclude that
Google "must not care" about the fragmentation issue.
To be fair, Google
faces a difficult problem. Both OEMs and mobile carriers customize the
open-source OS, so that there are differences even for users running the same
version of Android on different devices or with different providers. And
neither OEMs nor carriers are in the business of providing OS updates, and have
incentives for encouraging users to buy new phones instead.
The PDK won't change
any of those factors. Its goal is simply to get phones running a particular
version of the OS into consumers' hands faster, Google representatives told
developers. Google does have at least one way to fix the problem, according to
analyst Ezra Gottheil, with Technology Business Research. The company could
make a version of Android that is more uniform across devices and carriers, he
said. Users could then update the OS directly from Google, much as iOS users do
from Apple. But the OEMs and carriers want to be able to customize the OS to
make it look like their product, according to Gottheil.
Google must therefore
navigate between angering its hardware partners and its developers. "They're
trying to knock the edges of the problem," Gottheil said. But
fragmentation contributes to the higher cost of making apps for Android, according to mobile analytics firm Flurry, meaning Google
risks chasing its developers away if it does too little to address the problem.
"The danger there would be they get a reputation of having no decent apps,
but I think they're kind of far away from that," Gottheil said. Indeed,
developers at the conference seemed to accept that fragmentation can be an
occupational hazard of open-source development. They also noted that Google
offers tools in its support libraries to help them work with the multiple
versions of Android.
"Android is
really the first time that we have an operating system that can run on this
widely different array of devices, and more or less you can write the same code
that's really easily portable, which has been the dream. I really think that
the pros of that far outweigh a more integrated system where you only have a
few different pieces of hardware," said Zack Juhasz, of a yet-to-launch
startup, Tenkiv.
via: PCworld
Comments
Post a Comment
Be sure to check back again because I do make every effort to reply to your comments here. Karibu :)